Grace to you and peace from God our Father and from our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Amen. The text is the Gospel reading from Matthew 20.
My brother-in-law, Josh, is one
of the wisest fathers I know. Years ago, when his kids were little, like most
young ‘uns, they were very worried about things being fair. “That’s not fair,”
they determined, based on their respective opinions of course. From permissions
given to punishments received, the kids kept close tabs to make sure someone
wasn’t slighted while another was seemingly favored. After one-too-many
litanies about fairness, Josh put his foot down. “Fair isn’t equal and equal
isn’t fair,” he said. His point, of course, is that circumstances, situations,
abilities, and a whole slough of other things all factor into decisions besides
“fairness.”
I tell you this as a way to
understand today’s parable. In the story, the first-hired, longest-working hand
is worried about fairness. He spent the day hard at work in exchange for a
day’s pay. When it was Miller Time and the crew lined up to be paid, he
observed another hand, who only had an hour on the time clock, receive a
denarius, a day’s full wage. Seeing this, he started calculating how this would
go for himself. If a hand who worked just an hour earned a day’s wage, then he
should have an absolute windfall in his paycheck. When it was his turn, he
expected a ten-fold blessing. When a single denarius was deposited into his
tired, sore, blistered hand, he was infuriated. That’s not fair! Equal, yes;
fair, no.
| Rembrandt - The Laborers in the Vineyard |
I suspect that most of us, including Samuel Gompers, would line up on the side of the sweat-soaked worker. From a standpoint of fairness, he has a point, doesn’t he? If an hour’s work is worth a day’s pay, ten a day’s worth of work should be all the more. Anything less just isn’t fair.
But, is that presumption itself
fair? Let’s reconsider and change our perspective of the narrative. Think of the
story through the lens of the Master. He had promised a day’s wage for a day’s
labor. The man whom he hired early in the day accepted that proposition for a
day’s pay for a day’s work and, at the end of the day, he was paid as promised.
Anyone at the US Bureau of Labor would say that is a complete contract and
completely fair. So, the question becomes what did the Master do wrong – either
with the first hired or the last hired? Answer: nothing. The Master fulfilled
his obligation. Also, you notice that the last hired was promised nothing but a
job. The parable doesn’t say what his rate of pay would be. I imagine that he
assumed he would receive a portion of a denarius, a couple of shekels. What he
received instead was a full day’s pay out of the Master’s generosity. He didn’t
do anything to receive such a tremendous gift. The Master wasn’t guided by
fairness. He was acting out of His own grace and mercy towards the hired hands
whom he chose, and that included both the first and the last-hired ones.
Here’s where the story gets
interesting. Listen again to verses 11 and 12: “And on receiving [the
denarius], [the first-hired ones] grumbled at the master of the house saying,
‘These last worked only one hour, and you have made them equal to us who have borne
the burden of the day and the scorching heat.” Now, here is my question to you:
what were they complaining about? Here’s a clue – it wasn’t their pay. They had
no issue with their own denarius. They got what was promised. That was fair.
They were lamenting what the others received. The others, the late-hired ones,
got the same, equal pay. It wasn’t fair that they got the same pay as the ones
who worked all day. There’s a fun word in German, gluckschmertz, that
means to have pain in someone else’s pleasure. It’s like jealousy on steroids.
Instead of experiencing joy at the blessing that those last-hired ones
received, the first-hired were filled with gluckschmertz at what the
others received instead. It’s not fair.
But, is that really true? Were
they really upset at what the short-time workers received? I don’t think so.
What were the first-hired ones really complaining about? It wasn’t really that
they last-hired received the same pay. They were complaining about the Master’s
abundant graciousness, specifically in His giving the same pay to those who
only worked a short time. This moves the statement from “It’s not fair” to
“You’re not fair.”
Parables, you remember, are
stories that are told to help us understand something about Jesus’ reigning in
heaven and on earth. But, they aren’t just dropped out of the blue. There’s a
context, something that spurred Jesus’ telling of the story. The context, here,
is that at the end of chapter 19, Jesus has a challenging conversation with a
young man who thinks he can do something to have – literally, to obtain –
eternal life. Speaking of salvation, Jesus tells the man, “With man, this is
impossible; with God, all things are possible.” For Peter, if salvation isn’t
partly due to what the 12 have done as followers, you know – credit where
credit is due - that is troublesome. You also remember that we said the Peter
and the Twelve are anticipating their own places in the Kingdom. Expecting
Jesus’ to be an über-Messiah, they are expecting to be thus honored by
Him for being The Twelve. Jesus’ answer, though, crashes against that idea. So,
Peter utters, “See – we have left everything and followed you. What, then, will
we have?” I take the question to be something like this: Hey, Jesus…we left
everything for you – family, business, everything! – and we’ve been following
you for almost three years. It’s not fair that others suddenly climb on board
this discipleship experience with us and inherit the Kingdom as well!” You can
hear the unsaid “It’s not fair” lurking just below the surface.
You see, Peter is worried about
everyone else. Peter has forgotten what the 12 have already received,
themselves. More importantly, Peter has forgotten from whom the gifts come and
why they are given in the first place. From being called to be a disciple to
being eyewitnesses of His ministry to being sent out in His name and in His
power, it has all been by God’s grace through the words of Jesus. He chose the
Twelve; He equipped them; He forgives them for their foolishness and arrogance;
He will show mercy to the Eleven who all run away as He dies. He will even
reinstate Peter and Company after the resurrection.
Fair is a dangerous prospect when
argued against God’s judgement. The Old Adam and Old Eve think they can argue
fairness based on the merits, on getting close, on doing pretty well, on being
self-worthy. Fair is daring to tell God what we think He should do. But if you
want to argue fairness against God, it will come back to bite you. Do you want
fair? The wages of sin is death. Do you want fair? Be holy, as I the Lord thy
God am holy. Do you want fair? Do this and you will live. Do you want fair? Whoever
keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking
all of it. Standing in the presence of God and arguing on the basis of fairness
is a deadly proposition, indeed. Standing before the holiness and fulness of
God, the only place to turn is His mercy for the sake of Christ Jesus.
When it comes to mercy, Jesus’
gift is equally perfect. Grace doesn’t see any of the marks or standards that
we might use to measure worthiness. God’s grace doesn’t depend on the length of
service as a disciple, or the strength of our faith. His grace doesn’t hinge on
the greatness of our works or the power of our good deeds. Grace isn’t
dependent on the frequency of worship attendance or the fullness of the
offering envelope or the number of Bible passages memorized. Grace doesn’t
apply more if you’re a fifth generation confirmed member of a Lutheran church
or if the only time you’ve ever set foot in a church is for a friend’s funeral.
Grace is based on nothing more than the love and compassion of God for sinners
that caused Him to sacrifice His Son so that those sinners would not die into
eternity. Grace isn’t about how good, that is worthy, you think yourself to be
– or, unworthy you consider yourself, for that matter. Grace is not for “good
Christians,” but it is for the faithful Christian who trusts in Christ and His
death alone.
If you want to see unfairness,
look no further than the cross. The death of Jesus is the single, most unfair
thing, moment, in the history of all history. A perfect Man died for imperfect
people; a holy Man died for the most unholy of deeds; a sinless Man died for
the sins of the world that deserved hell; a spotless Lamb was sacrificed for
sin-stained people who, themselves, should have been sacrificed. Jesus died for
sinners. “God made Him who knew no sin to become sin for us,” Scripture says.
Fair? Not hardly. Yet, although He was God, He did not count equality with God
to be grasped and took upon Himself the death of the sinner in our place.
Although not fair, the exchange was equal: Our sins became His; His holiness
became ours. His life exchanged for our death; His death exchanged for our
life. He suffered hell – the complete absence of the Father – for us, so that
we would be welcomed into eternity with Him. It was never about fairness. It
was about His faithfulness to the Father’s will for us.
And, it is the Father’s perfect
will to welcome into the Kingdom any and all whenever they trust His mercy, by
grace through faith, in Christ as the crucified and risen Savior of the world.